State v. Mr. G. –Sex Offender Probation Violation – NO PRISON TIME

rogerSex Crimes, Probation Violation, Case Successes

State v. Mr. G. (2022)  Practice Area: Criminal Law / Sex Crimes   Date: March 7, 2022  Outcome: NO PRISON TIME for probation violation for one count of Attempt to Commit Molestation of a Child, a class 3 felony and Dangerous Crime Against Children  Description: Maricopa County, State v. Mr. G.  Mr. G. was facing probation violation proceedings for multiple violations and also committed a new …

State v. Mr. C.C (2022)

rogerProbation Violation, Case Successes

State v. Mr. C. C. (2022) Practice Area: Criminal Law/ Probation Violation Date: January 19, 2022 Outcome: Reinstated to Probation Description: Maricopa County Superior Court: State v. Mr. C.C. was alleged to have violated the terms of his probation on three separate cases.  As with most felony probation violations, a person risks being sentenced to prison and/or to some additional jail time.  After …

Probation Reinstated and Terms Modified to Reside Out-of-State State v. Ms. A. (2019)

rogerProbation Violation, Case Successes

Practice Area: Criminal Law / Probation Revocation/Modification Date: October 16, 2019 Outcome: Probation Reinstated and Terms Modified to Reside Out-of-State Description: Maricopa County Superior Court, State v. Ms. A. Ms. A. was reinstated to Unsupervised Probation for one year. The original probation terms imposed prevented Ms. A from residing outside the State of Arizona. Due to not having another place …

State v. Mr. R – Probation Violation(2017)

Cindy CastilloProbation Violation, Case Successes

State v. Mr. R (2017) Practice Area: Criminal Law/ Probation Violation Date: July 5, 2017 Description: Maricopa County Superior Court: Mr. R was alleged to have violated the terms of his probation. As with most felony probation violations, a person risks being sentenced to prison. After gathering mitigation, Ms. Castillo successfully argued to have Mr. R reinstated to probation with …

State v. Mr. TB (2017) – Probation Reinstated

Cindy CastilloProbation Violation, Case Successes

State v. Mr. TB (2017) Practice Area: Criminal Law/ Probation Violation Date: January 19, 2017 Description: Maricopa County Superior Court: TB was alleged to have violated the terms of his probation. As with most felony probation violations, a person risks being sentenced to prison, In TB’s case the probation office was requesting he be revoked to prison for five years. …

Sex Crime Probation Modification Granted 2016

Cindy CastilloSex Crimes, Probation Violation, Case Successes

State v. Mr. B (2016) Practice Area: Criminal Law/ Sex Crimes/ Attempted Sexual Assault/ Probation Modification Date: November 4, 2016 Outcome: Modification of Probation as requested by Mr. B. Description: Maricopa County Superior Court: Mr. B. had pled guilty in January 2011 to two Counts of Attempted Sexual Assault, both Class 3 Felonies. He was placed on lifetime probation. As part …

State v. Ms. KR (2016)

Cindy CastilloProbation Violation, Case Successes

State v. Ms. KR (2016) Practice Area: Criminal Law/ Ignition Interlock Violation Date: 03/08/2016 Description: Downtown Justice Court: KR was alleged to have driven on a restricted license, due to a failure to install an ignition interlock. KR maintained her innocence throughout the pretrial litigation of her case. Mr. Cronin secured a dismissal for this case.

State v. Ms. JV (2016)

Cindy CastilloProbation Violation, Case Successes

State v. Ms. JV (2016) Practice Area: Criminal Law/Probation Violation Date: 11/17/2015 Description: Pinal County Superior Court: JV was alleged to have violated the terms of her probation, after allegedly not participating in her treatment and counseling help, having contact with law enforcement and continuing to allegedly use illegal drugs. The Probation Department was recommending JV be revoked to prison. …

State v. Mr. SG (2016)

Cindy CastilloProbation Violation, Case Successes

State v. Mr. SG (2015) Practice Area: Criminal Law/ Probation Violation Date: 07/23/2015 Description: Maricopa County Superior Court: SG was alleged to have violated the terms of his probation. As most felony probation violations, a person risks being sentenced to prison. After gathering mitigation, Ms. Castillo successfully argued to have SG reinstated to probation.    

Juvenile Crime Lawyer in Phoenix AZ

3rd Probation Violation- Probation Reinstated (2015)

Cindy CastilloProbation Violation, Case Successes

State v. AM  Practice Area: Criminal Law Charges: Probation Violation (3rd violation) Date: October 20, 2015 Outcome: Reinstated to Intensive Probation with 10 days Jail Description: Client, AM, was on probation for Aggravated DUI.  After several violations of DUI Court Orders and 2 previous probation violations, AM violated probation again.  The probation department recommended that AM’s probation be revoked and he be sent to …

Juvenile Crime Lawyer in Phoenix AZ

2nd Probation Violation- Probation Reinstated (2015)

Cindy CastilloProbation Violation, Case Successes

State v. SG, Maricopa County Superior Court Practice Area: Criminal Law Charges: Probation Violation (2nd violation) Date: September 14, 2015 Outcome: Reinstated to Intensive Probation with 60 days in Jail Description: Client was on probation for 3 counts of Attempted Exploitation of a Minor, class 3  DCAC (Dangerous Crimes Against Children) felonies.  SG violated probation for the second time and was facing a lengthy …

Probation Violation 2014

Cindy CastilloProbation Violation, Case Successes

State v. Mr. R. (2014)  Practice Area: Violation of Probation Date: June 10th, 2014 Outcome: No Jail Time Description: Gilbert Municipal Court: Probation reinstated. Results depend upon factors unique to each case. Results in one case do not predict results in another case.

Probation Violation 2013

Cindy CastilloProbation Violation, Case Successes

State v. Mr. J.D. (2013) Practice Area: Multiple counts of violations of probation Date: October 16th, 2013 Outcome: Reinstated to probation Description: Maricopa County Superior Court Results depend upon factors unique to each case. Results in one case do not predict results in another case.